4.7 Article

Cancer sternness and metastasis: Therapeutic consequences and perspectives

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER
卷 46, 期 7, 页码 1198-1203

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2010.02.030

关键词

Metastases

类别

资金

  1. Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology
  2. Dutch Cancer Society
  3. Dutch Government [03038]
  4. EU

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The transient and dynamic nature of cancer cells that underlie metastasis cannot only be explained by the progressive accumulation of irreversible genetic changes occurring in the primary tumour. The capacity of cells to switch between different cellular identities, as in epithelial to mesenchymal (EMT) and mesenchymal to epithelial transitions (MET), allows them to respond to different cellular environments, thus efficiently disseminating from the primary mass to eventually colonise distant organs. These more dynamic stem-like cancer cells are earmarked by the ability to self-renew and de-/re-differentiate, and eventually recapitulate the heterogeneous composition of the primary tumour in a distant organ site. This dynamic concept of metastasis has profound consequences and implications for cancer diagnostics, prognostics and therapy. Many of the characteristics that define stem cells, like dormancy, active DNA repair, the expression of several drug transporters, and resistance to apoptosis may underlie the capacity of migrating cancer cells to survive conventional therapeutic protocols based on genotoxic agents targeting active proliferating cells. Accordingly, signal transduction pathways that regulate the balance between self-renewal and differentiation are likely to represent future targets in the development of tailor-made intervention strategies. Also, specific stem cell features, such as the capacity to migrate to diseased areas (pathotropism), open novel avenues towards the development of cell vehicles capable of tracking and delivering anti-cancer compounds to disseminated metastatic lesions. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据