4.7 Article

The efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil in colorectal cancer depends on the mismatch repair status

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER
卷 45, 期 3, 页码 365-373

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.07.016

关键词

Colorectal cancer; Treatment; Microsatellite instability; 5-Fluorouracil; Prognosis

类别

资金

  1. Fondo de Investigacion Sanitaria (FIS) [01/0104]
  2. Instituto de Salud Carlos III [RC03/02, RC03/10]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aims: The aim of this study is to evaluate if mismatch repair (MMR) defective colorectal cancer has a different response to adjuvant 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) chemotherapy in a cohort of patients prospectively followed during 5 years. Methods: The cohort included 754 surgically treated patients with colorectal cancer. MMR status was diagnosed by MLH1 and MSH2 immunohistochemistry and microsatellite instability analysis. Median follow-up was 49.2 months (range 1-73). At inclusion, 505 patients were diagnosed as TNM II or III stage, analysis of the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy was made on this population. Adjuvant chemotherapy was applied to 248 patients (98.2% 5-FU based). Results: MMR deficiency was found in 76 patients (10.1%). No differences were found in overall survival (log-rank p = 0.3) or disease-free survival (log-rank p = 0.3) regarding MMR status. Adjuvant chemotherapy improves survival in patients in the 11 or III stage, but this improvement is only evident in patients with MMR-competent tumours (log-rank p = 0.00001). Survival of patients with MMR-defective tumours does not improve with adjuvant chemotherapy (log-rank p = 0.7). A multivariate analysis showed an independent effect of the interaction between MMR status and adjuvant chemotherapy (Hazard ratio 2.04; 95% confidence interval: 1.42-2.93). Conclusion: In a cohort of colorectal cancer patients, those with MMR-deficient tumours seem not to benefit from 5-FU-based chemotherapy. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据