4.4 Article

Effects of high vs. moderate exercise intensity during interval training on lipids and adiponectin levels in obese young females

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY
卷 113, 期 10, 页码 2531-2540

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00421-013-2689-5

关键词

Training intensity; Intermittent exercise; Adipose tissue; Insulin resistance; Adolescent

资金

  1. Ministry of Higher Education, Scientific Research and Technology of Tunisia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We investigate the effects of 12-week interval training of moderate- or high-intensity exercise on blood lipids and plasma levels of adiponectin. Thirty-four obese adolescent females [age = 15.9 +/- A 0.3 years; BMI and BMI-Z-score = 30.8 +/- A 1.6 kg/m(2) and 3 +/- A 0.3, respectively], were randomized to high-intensity interval training (HIIT, n = 11), moderate-intensity interval training (MIIT, n = 11), or a control group (CG, n = 12). Maximal oxygen uptake (), maximal aerobic speed (MAS), plasma lipids and adiponectin levels were measured in all subjects before and after training. Following the training program, in both training groups, body mass, BMI-Z-score, and percentage body fat (% BF) decreased, while and MAS increased. Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and adiponectin levels were positively altered (-12.6 and -7.4 %; 6.3 and 8.0 %; 35.8 and 16.2 %; high to moderate training program, respectively). Waist circumference, triglyceride and total cholesterol decreased only in HIIT group (-3.5; -5.3 and -7.0 %, respectively, in all P < 0.05). Significant decrease in the usual index of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) occurred in HIIT and MIIT groups (-29.2 +/- A 5.3 and -18.4 +/- A 8.6 %, respectively; P < 0.01). The results show that HIIT positively changes blood lipids and adiponectin variables in obese adolescent girls, resulting in improved insulin sensitivity, as attested by a lower HOMA-IR, and achieving better results compared to moderate-intensity exercise.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据