4.4 Article

The impact of exercise intensity on the release of cardiac biomarkers in marathon runners

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY
卷 111, 期 12, 页码 2961-2967

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00421-011-1922-3

关键词

cTnI; NT-proBNP; Cardiac damage; Amateur runners

资金

  1. Department of Science and Technology, Government of Aragon
  2. Ministry of Science and Innovation of the Spanish Government [DEP 2010-16767]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We sought to determine the influence of exercise intensity on the release of cardiac troponin I (cTnI) and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) in amateur marathon runners. Fourteen runners completed three exercise trials of the same duration but at exercise intensities corresponding to: (a) a competitive marathon [mean +/- A SD: heart rate 159 +/- A 7 beat min(-1), finish time 202 +/- A 14 min]; (b) 95% of individual anaerobic threshold [heart rate 144 +/- A 6 beat min(-1)] and; (c) 85% of individual anaerobic threshold [heart rate 129 +/- A 5 beat min(-1)]. cTnI and NT-proBNP were assayed from blood samples collected before, 30 min and 3 h post-exercise for each trial. cTnI and NT-proBNP were not different at baseline before each trial. After exercise at 85% of individual anaerobic threshold cTnI was not significantly elevated. Conversely, cTnI was elevated after exercise at 95% of individual anaerobic threshold (0.016 mu g L-1) and to an even greater extent after exercise at competition intensity (0.054 mu g L-1). Peak post-exercise values of NT-proBNP were elevated to a similar extent after all exercise trials (P < 0.05). The upper reference limit for cTnI (0.04 mu g L-1) was exceeded in six subjects at competition intensity. No data for NT-proBNP surpassed its upper reference limit. Peak post-exercise values for cTnI and NT-proBNP were correlated with their respective baseline values. These data suggest exercise intensity influences the release of cTnI, but not NT-proBNP, and that competitive marathon running intensity is required for cTnI to be elevated over its upper reference limit.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据