4.4 Article

Muscle fiber conduction velocity is more affected after eccentric than concentric exercise

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY
卷 111, 期 2, 页码 261-273

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00421-010-1652-y

关键词

Electrical stimulation; Exercise-induced muscle damage; Sarcolemma; M-wave; Muscle fatigue

资金

  1. Academy of Finland [123151]
  2. Compagnia di San Paolo and Fondazione CRT
  3. Academy of Finland (AKA) [123151, 123151] Funding Source: Academy of Finland (AKA)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

It has been shown that mean muscle fiber conduction velocity (CV) can be acutely impaired after eccentric exercise. However, it is not known whether this applies to other exercise modes. Therefore, the purpose of this experiment was to compare the effects of eccentric and concentric exercises on CV, and amplitude and frequency content of surface electromyography (sEMG) signals up to 24 h post-exercise. Multichannel sEMG signals were recorded from biceps brachii muscle of the exercised arm during isometric maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) and electrically evoked contractions induced by motor-point stimulation before, immediately after and 2 h after maximal eccentric (ECC group, N = 12) and concentric (CON group, N = 12) elbow flexor exercises. Isometric MVC decreased in CON by 21.7 +/- 12.0% (+/- SD, p < 0.01) and by 30.0 +/- 17.7% (p < 0.001) in ECC immediately post-exercise when compared to baseline. At 2 h post-exercise, ECC showed a reduction in isometric MVC by 24.7 +/- 13.7% (p < 0.01) when compared to baseline, while no significant reduction (by 8.0 +/- 17.0%, ns) was observed in CON. Similarly, reduction in CV was observed only in ECC both during the isometric MVC (from baseline of 4.16 +/- 0.3 to 3.43 +/- 0.4 m/s, p < 0.001) and the electrically evoked contractions (from baseline of 4.33 +/- 0.4 to 3.82 +/- 0.3 m/s, p < 0.001). In conclusion, eccentric exercise can induce a greater and more prolonged reduction in muscle force production capability and CV than concentric exercise.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据