4.4 Article

Slow (V) over dotO2 kinetics during moderate- intensity exercise as markers of lower metabolic stability and lower exercise tolerance

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY
卷 111, 期 3, 页码 345-355

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00421-010-1609-1

关键词

Gas exchange kinetics; O-2 deficit; Exercise tolerance

资金

  1. ASI-OSMA [I/007/06/0, 1B-32-1]
  2. Telethon/UILDM [GUP 08007]
  3. Ministry of Science and Higher Education (Poland) [N N 404 196637]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An analysis of previously published data obtained by our group on patients characterized by markedly slower pulmonary (V) over dotO(2) kinetics (heart transplant recipients, patients with mitochondrial myopathies, patients with McArdle disease) was carried out in order to suggest that slow (V) over dotO(2) kinetics should not be considered the direct cause, but rather a marker, of impaired exercise tolerance. For a given ATP turnover rate, faster (or slower) (V) over dotO(2) kinetics are associated with smaller (or greater) muscle [PCr] decreases. The latter, however, should not be taken per se responsible for the higher (or lower) exercise tolerance, but should be considered within the general concept of metabolic stability. Good muscle metabolic stability at a given ATP turnover rate (similar to power output) is associated with relatively smaller decreases, compared to rest, in [PCr] and in the Gibbs free energy of ATP hydrolysis, as well as with relatively smaller increases in [Pi], [ADP(free)], [AMP(free)], and [IMPfree], metabolites directly related to fatigue. Disturbances in muscle metabolic stability can affect muscle function in various ways, whereas good metabolic stability is associated with less fatigue and higher exercise tolerance. Smaller [PCr] decreases, however, are strictly associated with a faster (V) over dotO(2) kinetics. Thus, faster (V) over dotO(2) kinetics may simply be an epiphenomenon of a relatively higher metabolic stability, which would then represent the relevant variable in terms of fatigue and exercise tolerance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据