4.4 Article

Excessive skeletal muscle recruitment during strenuous exercise in McArdle patients

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY
卷 110, 期 5, 页码 1047-1055

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00421-010-1585-5

关键词

EMG; Metabolic disease (inherited); Muscle disease

资金

  1. South African Medical Research Council
  2. Discovery
  3. Fondo de Investigaciones Sanitarias (FIS) [PI061183]
  4. Spanish Ministry of Education [EX-2007-1124]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We compared the cardiorespiratory response and muscle recruitment [as determined by electromyography (EMG)] of 37 McArdle patients [19 males, 37.4 +/- 2.8 years, body mass index (BMI): 25.1 +/- 4.7 kg m(-2)] and 33 healthy controls (18 males, 36.4 +/- 10.0 years, BMI: 25.7 +/- 3.8 kg m(-2)) during cycle-ergometer exercise (an incremental test to exhaustion and a 12-min submaximal constant workload test). We obtained cardiorespiratory [oxygen uptake and heart rate (HR)] and EMG data (rectus femoris and vastus lateralis muscles). During the incremental test, the patients exhibited the expected hyperkinetic cardiovascular response shown by a marked increase in the slope of the HR: Power relationship (p<0.001). Throughout the incremental test and at the point of fatigue, the patients produced significantly less power than the controls (peak power output: 67 +/- 21 vs. 214 +/- 56 watts respectively, p<0.001), yet they demonstrated significantly higher levels of muscle activity for a given absolute power. During the constant workload test, patients displayed higher levels of EMG activity than the controls during the second half of the test, despite a lower power production (34 +/- 13 vs. 94 +/- 29 watts respectively, p<0.001). In conclusion, since the McArdle patients required more motor unit recruitment for a given power output, our data suggest that the state of contractility of their muscles is reduced compared with healthy people. Excessive muscle recruitment for a given load could be one of the mechanisms explaining the exercise intolerance of these patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据