4.5 Article

Physical activity in relation to body size and composition in women in UK Biobank

期刊

ANNALS OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
卷 25, 期 6, 页码 406-413

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2015.01.015

关键词

Adiposity; Body fat percentage; Body mass index; Cross-sectional studies; Intensity; Menopause; Physical activity

资金

  1. Cancer Research UK [C570/A11691]
  2. Clarendon Fund
  3. Cancer Research UK [16491] Funding Source: researchfish
  4. Medical Research Council [MC_qA137853] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: Physical activity is thought to protect against obesity, but the evidence is limited and few large studies of this topic have direct, objective measures of several different anthropometric variables. We examined the association of self-reported physical activity with measures of total and central adiposity. Methods: Our cross-sectional study included 38,201 premenopausal and 94,592 postmenopausal healthy women aged 40 to 70 years in UK Biobank, recruited from 2006 to 2010. Results: Means for total and vigorous physical activity were 31.3 (SD, 30.8) and 9.7 (SD, 14.8) metabolic equivalent h/wk, respectively, for premenopausal and 34.4 (SD, 33.1) and 8.9 (SD, 15.6) metabolic equivalent h/wk, respectively, for postmenopausal women. Multiple linear regression models showed that in both premenopausal and postmenopausal women, body mass index, body fat mass and percentage, trunk fat mass and percentage, waist and hip circumference, and waist-to-hip ratio were lower in women with higher physical activity (P <.0001). Within each category of total physical activity, a larger proportion of vigorous physical activity was associated with lower adiposity (P <.0001). Conclusions: These findings support the roles of a physically active lifestyle and vigorous exercise in maintaining healthy body size and composition. Higher exercise intensity may be associated with lower adiposity, beyond the influence of exercise frequency and duration. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据