4.6 Article

Scaling of entanglement in 2+1-dimensional scale-invariant field theories

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/1742-5468/2015/02/P02010

关键词

quantum phase transitions (theory); entanglement in extended quantum systems (theory)

资金

  1. National Science Foundation at University of Illinois [DMR-1064319, DMR-1408713]
  2. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  3. Division Of Materials Research [1064319] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  4. Division Of Materials Research
  5. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1408713] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We study the universal scaling behavior of the entanglement entropy of critical theories in 2 + 1 dimensions. We specially consider two fermionic scale-invariant models, free massless Dirac fermions and a model of fermions with quadratic band touching, and numerically study the two-cylinder entanglement entropy of the models on the torus. We find that in both cases the entanglement entropy satisfies the area law and has the subleading term which is a scaling function of the aspect ratios of the cylindrical regions. We test the scaling of entanglement in both the free fermion models using three possible scaling functions for the subleading term derived from (a) the quasi-1D conformal field theory, (b) the bosonic quantum Lifshitz model and (c) the holographic AdS/CFT correspondence. For the later case we construct an analytic scaling function using holography, appropriate for critical theories with a gravitational dual description. We find that the subleading term in the fermionic models is well described, for a range of aspect ratios, by the scaling form derived from the quantum Lifshitz model as well as that derived using the AdS/CFT correspondence (in this case only for the Dirac model). For the case where the fermionic models are placed on a square torus we find the fit to the different scaling forms is in agreement to surprisingly high precision.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据