4.7 Article

Prediction of sunflower grain oil concentration as a function of variety, crop management and environment using statistical models

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF AGRONOMY
卷 54, 期 -, 页码 84-96

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.eja.2013.12.002

关键词

GAM; Genotype by environment interaction; Regression model; Sunflower oil concentration

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Sunflower (Helianthus annuus L) raises as a competitive oilseed crop in the current environmentally friendly context. To help targeting adequate management strategies, we explored statistical models as tools to understand and predict sunflower oil concentration. A trials database was built upon experiments carried out on a total of 61 varieties over the 2000-2011 period, grown in different locations in France under contrasting management conditions (nitrogen fertilization, water regime, plant density). 25 literature-based predictors of seed oil concentration were used to build 3 statistical models (multiple linear regression, generalized additive model (GAM), regression tree (RT)) and compared to the reference simple one of Pereyra-lrujo and Aguirrezabal (2007) based on 3 variables. Performance of models was assessed by means of statistical indicators, including root mean squared error of prediction (RMSEP) and model efficiency (EF). GAM-based model performed best (RMSEP = 1.95%; EF = 0.71) while the simple model led to poor results in our database (RMSEP = 3.33%; EF = 0.09). We computed hierarchical contribution of predictors in each model by means of R-2 and concluded to the leading determination of potential oil concentration (OC), followed by post-flowering canopy functioning indicators (LAD2 and MRUE2), plant nitrogen and water status and high temperatures effect. Diagnosis of error in the 4 statistical models and their domains of applicability are discussed. An improved statistical model (GAM-based) was proposed for sunflower oil prediction on a large panel of genotypes grown in contrasting environments. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据