4.7 Article

LINTUL3, a simulation model for nitrogen-limited situations: Application to rice

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF AGRONOMY
卷 32, 期 4, 页码 255-271

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.eja.2010.01.003

关键词

Crop growth; CRRI; IRRI; Nutrition index; Calibration; Testing

类别

资金

  1. WOTRO

向作者/读者索取更多资源

LINTUL3 is a crop model that calculates biomass production based on intercepted photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) and light use efficiency (LUE). It is an adapted version of LINTUL2 (that simulates potential and water-limited crop growth), including nitrogen limitation. Nitrogen stress in the model is defined through the nitrogen nutrition index (NNI): the ratio of actual nitrogen concentration and critical nitrogen concentration in the plant. The effect of nitrogen stress on crop growth is tested in the model either through a reduction in LUE or leaf area (LA) or a combination of these two and further evaluated with independent datasets. However, water limitation is not considered in the present study as the crop is paddy rice. This paper describes the model for the case of rice, test the hypotheses of N stress on crop growth and details of model calibration and testing using independent data sets of nitrogen treatments (with fertilizer rates of 0-400 kg N ha(-1)) under varying environmental conditions in Asia. Results of calibration and testing are compared graphically, through Root Mean Square Deviation (RMSD), and by Average Absolute Deviation (AAD). Overall average absolute deviation values for calibration and testing of total aboveground biomass show less than 26% mean deviation from the observations though the values for individual experiments show a higher deviation up to 41%. In general, the model responded well to nitrogen stress in all the treatments without fertilizer application as observed, but between fertilized treatments the response was varying. Crown Copyright (C) 2010 Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据