4.7 Review

The importance of patient-reported outcomes: a call for their comprehensive integration in cardiovascular clinical trials

期刊

EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL
卷 35, 期 30, 页码 2001-+

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehu205

关键词

Cardiovascular clinical trials; Patient-reported outcomes; Health-related quality of life

资金

  1. Medical Research Council
  2. Canadian Institutes for Health Research
  3. Servier
  4. Biotronik
  5. Medtronic
  6. Amgen
  7. Pfizer
  8. 3M Medica
  9. MEDA Pharma
  10. Bristol-Myers Squibb
  11. Cardiovascular Therapeutics
  12. OMRON
  13. Sanofi
  14. St Jude Medical
  15. German Federal Ministry for Education and Research
  16. Foundation Leducq
  17. German Research Foundation
  18. European Union
  19. British Heart Foundation
  20. MRC [MR/K025643/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  21. Medical Research Council [MR/K025643/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Patient-reported outcomes (PROs), such as symptoms, health-related quality of life (HRQOL), or patient perceived health status, are reported directly by the patient and are powerful tools to inform patients, clinicians, and policy-makers about morbidity and 'patient suffering', especially in chronic diseases. Patient-reported outcomes provide information on the patient experience and can be the target of therapeutic intervention. Patient-reported outcomes can improve the quality of patient care by creating a holistic approach to clinical decision-making; however, PROs are not routinely used as key outcome measures in major cardiovascular clinical trials. Thus, limited information is available on the impact of cardiovascular therapeutics on PROs to guide patient-level clinical decision-making or policy-level decision-making. Cardiovascular clinical research should shift its focus to include PROs when evaluating the efficacy of therapeutic interventions, and PRO assessments should be scientifically rigorous. The European Society of Cardiology and other professional societies can take action to influence the uptake of PRO data in the research and clinical communities. This process of integrating PRO data into comprehensive efficacy evaluations will ultimately improve the quality of care for patients across the spectrum of cardiovascular disease.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据