4.7 Article

Women and men with stable coronary artery disease have similar clinical outcomes: insights from the international prospective CLARIFY registry

期刊

EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL
卷 33, 期 22, 页码 2831-2840

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehs289

关键词

CAD; CLARIFY; Gender; Prognosis; Registry; Women

资金

  1. NIHR Cardiovascular Biomedical Research Unit at the Royal Brompton Hospital
  2. Servier, France
  3. Servier
  4. Roche
  5. Boehringer Ingelheim
  6. Amgen
  7. Bayer
  8. Menarini
  9. TIMI Group
  10. DZHK (Deutsches Zentrum fur Herz-Kreislauf-Forschung-German Centre for Cardiovascular Research)
  11. BMBF (German Ministry of Education and Research)
  12. NYU School of Medicine
  13. Sanofi
  14. Ablynx
  15. Amarin
  16. Astellas
  17. AstraZeneca
  18. Boehringer-Ingelheim
  19. BMS
  20. Daiichi/sankyo
  21. Eisai
  22. GSK
  23. Lilly
  24. Medtronic
  25. MSD
  26. Novartis
  27. Otsuka
  28. Pfizer
  29. Medicines Company
  30. Vivus
  31. National Institute for Health Research [NF-SI-0611-10149] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Men and women differ in terms of presentation and management in coronary artery disease (CAD). Whether these differences translate into different clinical outcomes in stable CAD is unclear. We analysed data from the international prospective CLARIFY registry to compare cardiovascular clinical outcomes in men and women with stable CAD. We analysed 1-year outcomes in 30 977 outpatients with stable CAD [23 975 (77.4) men; 7002 (22.6) women]. Women were older than men, more likely to have hypertension and diabetes, and less likely to exercise or smoke. They had more frequent angina, but were less likely to have undergone diagnostic non-invasive testing or coronary angiography. Women received less optimized treatment for stable CAD. One-year outcomes were similar for men and women for the composite of cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, or stroke [adjusted rates 1.7 vs. 1.8, respectively, odds ratio (OR) 0.93, 95 confidence interval (CI) 0.751.15]; all-cause death (adjusted 1.5 vs. 1.6, OR: 0.91, 95 CI: 0.721.13); fatal or non-fatal myocardial infarction (adjusted 1.0 vs. 0.9, OR: 0.81, 95 CI: 0.601.08); and cardiovascular death or non-fatal myocardial infarction (adjusted 1.4 vs. 1.4, OR: 0.89, 95 CI: 0.701.12). Fewer women underwent revascularization (2.6 vs. 2.2, OR: 0.77, 95 CI: 0.640.93), although appropriateness was not analysed. The risk profiles of women and men with stable CAD differ substantially. However, 1-year outcomes were similar. Fewer women underwent revascularization. Further research is needed to better understand gender determinants of outcome and devise strategies to minimize bias in the management and treatment of women.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据