4.7 Article

Psoriasis and risk of atrial fibrillation and ischaemic stroke: a Danish Nationwide Cohort Study

期刊

EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL
卷 33, 期 16, 页码 2054-2064

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehr285

关键词

Atrial fibrillation; Ischaemic stroke; Psoriasis; Inflammation; Cardiovascular risk; Epidemiology

资金

  1. Department of Cardiology, Copenhagen University Hospital Gentofte, Denmark

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Psoriasis is a chronic inflammatory disease and inflammation contributes to the pathogenesis of atrial fibrillation (AF) and ischaemic stroke. We therefore investigated the risk of these endpoints in patients with psoriasis. Cohort study of the entire Danish population followed from 1997 to 2006 by individual-level-linkage of nationwide prospectively recorded registers. Multivariable Poissons regression and sensitivity analyses were used to assess the psoriasis-related risk of AF and ischaemic stroke. A total of 36 765 patients with mild psoriasis and 2793 with severe psoriasis were compared with 4 478 926 individuals, i.e. the reference population. In patients with mild psoriasis, the adjusted rate ratios (RRs) for AF were 1.50 (1.211.86) and 1.16 (1.081.24) in patients aged 50 and epsilon 50 years, respectively. Patients with severe psoriasis had a higher risk of AF with RRs 2.98 (1.804.92) in patients aged 50 years and 1.29 (1.011.65) in patients aged epsilon 50 years. Patients with psoriasis also demonstrated a disease severity-dependent increased risk of ischaemic stroke, i.e. RRs 1.97 (1.662.34) and 2.80 (1.814.34) in patients aged 50 years with mild and severe psoriasis, and RRs 1.13 (1.041.21) and 1.34 (1.041.71) in patients aged epsilon 50 years with mild and severe psoriasis, respectively. A range of sensitivity analyses yielded comparable results. Psoriasis is associated with increased risk of AF and ischaemic stroke. These novel results add to a growing body of evidence, suggesting that patients with psoriasis could be considered at increased cardiovascular risk.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据