4.7 Article

Inhibition of mitochondrial permeability transition to prevent the post-cardiac arrest syndrome: a pre-clinical study

期刊

EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL
卷 32, 期 2, 页码 226-235

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehq112

关键词

Cyclosporine A; Cardiac arrest; Cardiopulmonary resuscitation; Ischaemia; Reperfusion; Pharmacological post-conditioning

资金

  1. Societe de Reanimation de Langue Francaise

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aims Resuscitated cardiac arrest (CA), leading to harmful cardiovascular dysfunction and multiple organ failure, includes a whole-body hypoxia-reoxygenation phenomenon. Opening of the mitochondrial permeability transition pore (mPTP) appears to be a pivotal event in ischaemia-reperfusion injury. We hypothesized that pharmacological inhibition of mPTP opening may prevent the post-CA syndrome. Methods and results Anaesthetized New Zealand White rabbits underwent a 15 min primary asphyxial CA and 120 min of reperfusion following resuscitation. At reflow, animals received an intravenous bolus of either cyclosporine A (CsA, 5 mg/kg) or NIM 811 (2.5 mg/kg), two potent inhibitors of mPTP opening, or the CsA vehicle (control). Short-term survival, haemodynamics, regional (sonomicrometry), and global cardiac function (dP/dt and aortic flow) were assessed. We measured markers of cellular injuries and/or organ failure, including troponin Ic release, lacticodehydrogenase, lactate, creatinine, and alanine aminotransferase. Cyclosporine A and NIM 811 significantly improved short-term survival, post-resuscitation cardiac function, as well as liver and kidney failure (P < 0.05). CsA and NIM 811 both attenuated in vitro mPTP opening (calcium retention capacity by spectrofluorimetry) and restored oxidative phosphorylation when compared with controls (P < 0.05). Conclusion These data suggest that pharmacological inhibition of mPTP opening, added to basic life support, attenuates the post-CA syndrome and improves short-term outcomes in the rabbit model.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据