4.7 Article

Coronary microcirculatory vasodilator function in relation to risk factors among patients without obstructive coronary disease and low to intermediate Framingham score

期刊

EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL
卷 31, 期 8, 页码 936-942

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehp459

关键词

Coronary atherosclerosis; Female; Framingham risk score; Endothelial function; Microcirculation

资金

  1. NIH [K24, HL-69840, R01 HL-63911, DK73608, HL77131, HL085307]
  2. Mayo Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aims The study aim was to evaluate the relation between the Framingham risk score (FRS) and the presence of coronary risk factors to coronary microcirculatory vasodilator function in patients with early coronary atherosclerosis. Methods and results We evaluated 1063 patients (age: 50 +/- 12 years, 676 (64%) females) without significant narrowing (<30%) on coronary angiography who underwent invasive assessment of coronary endothelial function. Coronary blood flow (CBF) in response to the endothelium-dependent vasodilator acetylcholine was evaluated as well as the microvascular (endothelium-independent) coronary flow reserve (CFR) in response to intracoronary adenosine. Coronary blood flow and CFR were analysed in relation to the FRS and the presence of traditional and novel risk factors. The estimated 10 years risk in this group was 5.4 +/- 5.2%. Higher FRS was associated with lower CBF in men (P = 0.008), and was a univariate predictor of lower CFR (P = 0.012) in all patients. Multivariable analysis identified a higher FRS (P < 0.001), female sex (P < 0.001) and a positive family history of coronary disease (P = 0.043) as independent predictors of reduced CFR. Conclusion In patients without obstructive coronary disease, a higher FRS was an independent predictor of reduced CFR. The current study provides insight into the relation between cardiac risk profile and coronary microcirculatory function, and suggests that impaired microcirculatory vasodilator function may be present even in patients with a low to intermediate Framingham score.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据