4.0 Article

Benefits of an exercise wellness program after spinal cord injury

期刊

JOURNAL OF SPINAL CORD MEDICINE
卷 40, 期 2, 页码 154-158

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1179/2045772315Y.0000000038

关键词

Exercise; Quality of life; Spinal cord injury

资金

  1. Craig H. Neilsen Foundation [184409]
  2. Kenny Salvini Fund for SCI Rehabilitation
  3. Unbroken Foundation
  4. Northwest Regional Spinal Cord Injury System - National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research [H133N110009]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To describe the initial benefits of a structured group exercise program on exercise frequency and intensity, perceived health, pain, mood, and television watching habits. Design: Pre-test/post-test. Participants/methods: Eighty-nine persons with SCI participated voluntarily in a no-cost, twice weekly physical therapy group exercise class over 3 months. Forty-five persons completed pre-and post-participation interviews on exercise frequency and intensity, perceived health, pain, mood, sleep, and television watching habits. Results: Mean participant age of the respondents was 43.82 years. 49% had AIS C or D injuries, 24% had AIS A, B paraplegia, 9% had AIS A, B C1-C4 and 18% had AIS A, B C5-C8. 75.6% of participants were male and 84.4% had a traumatic etiology as the cause of their SCI. There was a significant improvement in days of strenuous and moderate exercise as well as health state. There was an average decrease in pain scores, depression scores, number of hours spent watching television, and days/week of mild exercise. Conclusion: Participation in structured, small group exercise as a component of a wellness program after SCI shows promise for improving regular exercise participation and health state, but benefits may also occur across other areas of health and function including mood, pain, and hours spent watching television. Further follow-up is needed to determine whether improvements can be maintained after program completion and across all neurological levels.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据