4.7 Article

Effect of age and sex on carotid intima-media thickness, elasticity and brachial endothelial function in healthy adults:: The Cardiovascular Risk in Young Finns Study

期刊

EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL
卷 29, 期 9, 页码 1198-1206

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehm556

关键词

endothelial function; intima-media thickness; arterial elasticity; reference values

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aims The objective was to produce reference values and to analyse the associations of age and sex with carotid intima-media thickness (IMT), carotid compliance (CAC), and brachial flow-mediated dilatation (FMD) in young healthy adults. Methods and results We measured IMT, CAC, and FMD with ultrasound in 2265 subjects aged 24-39 years. The mean values (mean +/- SD) in men and women were 0.592 +/- 0.10 vs. 0.572 +/- 0.08 mm (P < 0.0001) for IMT, 2.00 +/- 0.66 vs. 2.31 +/- 0.77%/10 mmHg (P < 0.0001) for CAC, and 6.95 +/- 4.00 vs. 8.83 +/- 4.56% (P < 0.0001) for FMD. The sex differences in IMT [95% confidence interval (CI) for sex difference -0.013 to 0.004 mm, P = 0.37] and CAC (-0.01 to 0.18%/10 mmHg, P = 0.09) became non-significant after adjustments with risk factors and carotid diameter. In FMD, the sex difference was unaltered after adjustments for risk factors, but was reversed after adjustment with brachial diameter (95% CI 0.18-1.32%, P < 0.01). With aging, IMT increased 5.7 +/- 0.4 mu m/year and CAC decreased 0.042 +/- 0.003%/10 mmHg/year. The association of age with IMT and CAC was slightly attenuated (12 and 22%, respectively) after adjustments with risk factors, but remained significant (both P < 0.0001). Aging was not significantly related to brachial FMD (P = 0.16). Conclusion Reference values produced in the present study can be utilized in the cardiovascular risk stratification among young people. Sex differences in the markers of subclinical atherosclerosis were mostly explained by differences in risk factors and vessel size. This emphasizes the importance of risk factor control in the prevention of atherosclerosis in young adults.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据