4.5 Article

Effects of postharvest oligochitosan treatment on anthracnose disease in citrus (Citrus sinensis L. Osbeck) fruit

期刊

EUROPEAN FOOD RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY
卷 240, 期 4, 页码 795-804

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00217-014-2385-7

关键词

Oligochitosan; Citrus fruit (Citrus sinensis L. Osbeck); Induced disease resistance; Reactive oxygen species (ROS) metabolism; Defense enzyme

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31271958]
  2. Key Project in Applied Technology of Chongqing Science and Technology Commission [cstc2012gg-yyjsB80003]
  3. Scientific Research Foundation for the Returned Overseas Chinese Scholars of the State Education Ministry

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Citrus fruit (Citrus sinensis L. Osbeck) is susceptible to infection by Colletotrichum gloeosporioides during poststorage, which rapidly decreases sensory and nutritional quality of the fruit. The ability of oligochitosan treatment to control C. gloeosporioides of citrus fruit during storage was examined, and possible underlying mechanisms were discussed. Disease incidence and lesion diameter were lower in oligochitosan-treated fruits compared with their respective controls. The fruits dipped in oligochitosan showed increased contents of lignin, hydroxyproline-rich glycoprotein (HRGP), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), ascorbate, glutathione, total phenol, and flavonoid compounds. In addition, enzymatic activities of superoxide dismutase (SOD, EC 1.15.1.1), catalase (CAT, EC 1.11.1.6), peroxidase (POD, EC 1.11.1.7), polyphenoloxidase (PPO, EC 1.14.18.1), ascorbate peroxidase (APX, EC 1.11.1.11), and beta-1, 3-glucanase (GLU, EC 3.2.1.39) also increased in citrus fruit peels, all of which were correlated with the onset of induced disease resistance. These results indicated that oligochitosan treatment can induce disease resistance of citrus fruit to C. gloeosporioides Penz. Oligochitosan can be a potential alternative to conventional control methods of postharvest anthracnose in citrus fruit.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据