4.5 Article

Construction of recombinant industrial brewer's yeast with lower diacetyl production and proteinase A activity

期刊

EUROPEAN FOOD RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY
卷 235, 期 5, 页码 951-961

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00217-012-1821-9

关键词

Proteinase A (PrA); Diacetyl; Head retention; Industrial brewer's yeast

资金

  1. program for Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team in University [IRT1166]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31271916]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The characteristic buttery taste of diacetyl has long been a major problem in the brewing industry, and the foam stability of unpasteurized beer is often influenced by proteinase A (PrA), which is encoded by PEP4 and released from yeast cells into beer during brewing. A recombinant industrial brewer's yeast strain that reduces the diacetyl content of beer and improves foam stability was constructed. We constructed a PGK1p-ILV5-PGK1t expression cassette, which was introduced into one of the PEP4 alleles via PCR-mediated homologous recombination. Then, the second PEP4 allele was disrupted using the Cre-loxP recombination system, and the recombinant strain was designated as S-CSIK12. The results show that the diacetyl production of S-CSIK12 is always lower than that of the host strain at all stages of beer fermentation. In addition, brewing with S-CSIK12 reduced the PrA activity of the final beer by 44 % compared with that using the wild-type strain. The head retention of the beer brewed with S-CSIK12 (260 +/- A 2 s) was better than that of the host strain S-6 (212 +/- A 3 s). Considering that more PrA is released from yeast cells during the final stage of main fermentation and that the timing of yeast cropping is determined by diacetyl reduction, brewing with strains that have low diacetyl production also reduced the PrA activity of the beer and improved its head retention. The present study provides reference for the brewing industry as well as research on the diacetyl reduction and foam stability of beer.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据