4.5 Article

Proteolysis of Cacioricotta cheese made from goat milk coagulated with caprifig (Ficus carica sylvestris) or calf rennet

期刊

EUROPEAN FOOD RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY
卷 234, 期 3, 页码 527-533

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00217-012-1668-0

关键词

Cacioricotta cheese; Fig coagulant; Proteolysis; MALDI-ToF mass spectrometry; Peptides

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A study was undertaken on Cacioricotta, a traditional Italian goat's cheese obtained from overheated milk (90 degrees C) without use of starter. The profile of proteolysis in the artisanal type, made with vegetable coagulant (latex released from caprifig branches) as milk clotting agent, was compared to that of the industrial one, manufactured with calf rennet. Particular aim of the investigation was to study the differences and, possibly, establish a useful tool for distinguishing the two types of cheese. The study was based on the quantification of the water soluble, 15% TCA soluble and amino acid nitrogen fractions, RP-HPLC separation of low molecular weight peptides and their identification by mass spectrometry (MALDI-ToF MS). The use of fig latex was associated to higher amounts of the nitrogen fractions and to RP-HPLC chromatograms very rich in peptides, in contrast to an almost complete lack of peptides in the industrial counterpart. These results confirm the strong proteolyitic activity exerted by the caprifig clotting enzymes in spite of the intense overheating of the milk, which is considered to cause reduction of the rate of casein degradation in cheese. The MS-based identification of several peptides provided a support at the molecular level for the characterization of Cacioricotta made with this vegetable coagulant and could be useful for tracing back purposes. In conclusion, the peptide pattern determined by the use of caprifig for milk coagulation can be considered a particular feature of the artisanal Cacioricotta, giving confirmation of its vocation to EU protection as typical product.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据