4.5 Article

Development and behaviour of 5-year-old very low birthweight infants

期刊

EUROPEAN CHILD & ADOLESCENT PSYCHIATRY
卷 19, 期 8, 页码 669-677

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00787-010-0104-x

关键词

Development; Behaviour; Five to Fifteen; Follow-up; Preterm infant; Regionalisation

资金

  1. Finnish Academy
  2. South-West Finnish Fund of Neonatal Research
  3. University Hospital EVO Funds
  4. Turku University Hospital Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The place and time of birth influence the mortality of premature infants. We studied the effect of prematurity, time of birth, birth hospital level and district on the development and behaviour in a national cohort of 5-year-old Finnish very low birthweight infants (VLBWI). All surviving VLBWI (gestational age < 32 weeks or birthweight a parts per thousand currency sign1,500 g) born in 2001-2002 in level II or III hospitals in Finland and full-term controls were included. The parents of 588 (64%) VLBWI and 176 (46%) controls returned the Five to Fifteen questionnaire (FTF) on the development and behaviour of their 5-year-old children. The questionnaire scores were linked to data from the National Medical Birth Register, the Hospital Discharge Register, the Register of Congenital Malformations and the Cause of Death Register. VLBWI had lower developmental and behavioural scores compared to the controls in all FTF domains. In VLBWI, the scores were less optimal, the lower the gestational age was. The time of birth, birth hospital level and district were not associated with the developmental and behavioural scores in VLBWI. In conclusion, short duration of pregnancy adversely influences development and behaviour in VLBWI. Despite differences previously demonstrated in mortality related to time and place of birth, there were no differences in developmental and behavioural scores in VLBWI according to the time of birth, birth hospital level or district. Thus, the survival advantage in level III hospitals seems not to be gained at the expense of behavioural or developmental problems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据