4.1 Article

Analysis of the source of heterogeneity in the osmotic response of plant membrane vesicles

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00249-008-0365-1

关键词

Aquaporins; Stopped flow; Osmotic permeability; Mathematical modeling; Simulations; Water transport

资金

  1. CONICET [PIP 5154]
  2. Universidad de Buenos Aires [UBACyT0407]
  3. ANPCyT [PICT04 15-949]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Plasma membrane vesicles have been widely employed to understand the biophysics of water movements, especially when active aquaporins are present. In general, water permeability coefficients in these preparations outcome from the analysis of the osmotic response of the vesicles by means of light scattering. As from now, this is possible by following a theoretical approach that assumes that scattered light follows a single exponential function and that this behavior is the consequence of vesicle volume changes due to an osmotic challenge. However, some experimental data do not necessarily fit to single exponentials but to double ones. It is argued that the observed double exponential behavior has two possible causes: different vesicle population in terms of permeability or in terms of size distribution. As classical models cannot identify this source of heterogeneity, a mathematical modeling approach was developed based on phenomenological equations of water transport. In the three comparative models presented here, it was assumed that water moves according to an osmotic mechanism across the vesicles, and there is no solute movement across them. Interestingly, when tested in a well described plasma membrane vesicle preparation, the application of these models indicates that the source of heterogeneity in the osmotic response is vesicles having different permeability, clearly discarding the variable size effect. In conclusion, the mathematical approach presented here allows to identify the source of heterogeneity; this information being of particular interest, especially when studying gating mechanisms triggered in water channel activity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据