4.1 Article

Metal effects on the membrane interactions of amyloid-β peptides

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00249-007-0251-2

关键词

amyloid A beta; cholesterol; metal interactions; peptide-lipid interactions; phospholipid membranes; solid-state NMR; structure; Alzheimer's disease

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A beta(1-42) peptide, found as aggregated species in Alzheimer's disease brain, is linked to the onset of dementia. We detail results of P-31 and H-2 solid-state NMR studies of model membranes with A beta peptides and the effect of metal ions (Cu2+ and Zn2+), which are found concentrated in amyloid plaques. The effects on the lipid bilayer and the peptide structure are different for membrane incorporated or associated peptides. Copper ions alone destabilise the lipid bilayer and induce formation of smaller vesicles, but not when A beta(1-42) is associated with the bilayer membrane. A beta(25-35), a fragment from the C-terminal end of A beta(1-42), which lacks the metal coordinating sites found in the full length peptide, is neurotoxic to cortical cortex cell cultures. Addition of metal ions has little effect on membrane bilayers with A beta(25-35) peptides. P-31 magic angle spinning NMR data show that A beta(1-42) and A beta(1-42)-Cu2+ complexes interact at the surface of anionic phospholipid membranes. Incorporated peptides, however, appear to disrupt the membrane more severely than associated peptides. Solid-state C-13 NMR was used to compare structural changes of A beta(1-42) to those of A beta(25-35) in model membrane systems of anionic phospholipids and cholesterol. The A beta peptides appeared to have an increase in beta-strand structure at the C-terminus when added to phospholipid liposomes. The inclusion of Cu2+ also influenced the observed chemical shift of residues from the C-terminal half, providing structural clues for the lipid-associated A beta/metal complex. The results point to the complex pathway(s) for toxicity of the full-length peptide.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据