4.5 Article

Increased 3-Hydroxykynurenine serum concentrations differentiate Alzheimer's disease patients from controls

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00406-012-0384-x

关键词

Alzheimer's disease; Biomarker; Kynurenine pathway; 3-Hydroxykynurenine; Tryptophan; Neurodegeneration

资金

  1. Friedrich Baur Foundation
  2. BMBF [01ES0704]
  3. Interdisciplinary Faculty, Department Ageing Science and Humanities, University of Rostock
  4. Hirnliga Foundation, Wiehl, Germany
  5. Alzheimer's Association [IIRG-08-89545]
  6. Rebecca Cooper Foundation (Australia)
  7. Curran Foundation
  8. University of New South Wales

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Increased degradation of tryptophan (TRP) through the kynurenine (KYN) pathway (KP) is known to be involved in the molecular mechanisms resulting in the neuropathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease (AD). Activation of the KP leads to the production of neurotoxic metabolites 3-hydroxykynurenine (3-HK) and quinolinic acid (QUIN) by immune cells and neuroprotective derivates kynurenic acid (KYNA) and picolinic acid (PIC) by astrocytes and neurons. We therefore investigated whether an imbalance between neurotoxic and neuroprotective kynurenine metabolites could be detected in patients with AD. We measured serum levels of TRP, KYNA, 3-HK, PIC and QUIN in 20 patients with AD and for comparison in 20 patients with major depression, and 19 subjectively cognitive impaired subjects. Serum levels of 3-HK were markedly increased in AD patients compared to the comparison groups (p < .0001). Serum levels of the other KP metabolites were not significantly different between groups. Our data indicate an increased production of the neurotoxic KP metabolite 3-HK in AD. In contrast to its downstream metabolites QUIN and PIC, 3-HK can cross the blood-brain barrier via an active transport process. Our data therefore indicate an enhanced availability of 3-HK in the brain of AD patients, which may be related to the previously reported higher production of QUIN in AD brains.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据