4.5 Review

Impact of TCF4 on the genetics of schizophrenia

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00406-011-0256-9

关键词

Schizophrenia; TCF4; PPI; Verbal memory; Sensorimotor; Gating; Pharmacogenetics

资金

  1. European Union [FP7-Health-F4-2009-242257-ADAMS]
  2. German Federal Ministry for Education and Research (BMBF) [POSITIVE 01GV0907, NGFN MooDs PNM-01GS08146-3]
  3. DFG [WA 737/7]
  4. Swiss National Science Foundation [PP00P1 123516]
  5. German Association for Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (DGPPN)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mutations of the transcription factor 4 (TCF4) gene cause mental retardation with or without associated facial dysmorphisms and intermittent hyperventilation. Subsequently, a polymorphism of TCF4 was shown in a genome-wide association study to slightly increase the risk of schizophrenia. We have further analysed the impact of this TCF4 variant rs9960767 on early information processing and cognitive functions in schizophrenia patients. We have shown in a sample of 401 schizophrenia patients that TCF4 influences verbal memory in the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test. Contrary to expectations, carriers of the schizophrenia-associated allele showed better recognition, thus indicating that while TCF4 influences verbal memory, the TCF4-mediated schizophrenia risk is not determined by the influence of TCF4 on verbal memory. TCF4 does not impact on various other cognitive functions belonging to the domains of attention and executive functions. Moreover, in a pharmacogenetic approach, TCF4 does not modulate the improvement of positive or negative schizophrenia symptoms during treatment with antipsychotics. Finally, we have assessed a key electrophysiological endophenotype of schizophrenia, sensorimotor gating. As measured by prepulse inhibition, the schizophrenia risk allele C of TCF4 rs9960767 reduces sensorimotor gating. This indicates that TCF4 influences key mechanisms of information processing, which may contribute to the pathogenesis of schizophrenia.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据