4.8 Article

Experimental Observation of Redox-Induced Fe-N Switching Behavior as a Determinant Role for Oxygen Reduction Activity

期刊

ACS NANO
卷 9, 期 12, 页码 12496-12505

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.5b05984

关键词

non-PGM catalysts; oxygen reduction reaction; active sites; redox transition; dynamic structure

资金

  1. U.S. Department of Energy, EERE [DE-EE-0000459]
  2. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Basic Energy Sciences
  3. Center for Synchrotron Biosciences [P30-EB-009998]
  4. National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (NBIB)
  5. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Office of Science, Basic Energy Sciences [DE-FG02-07ER46352]
  6. DOE [DE-AC02-05CH11231]
  7. DOE EFRC: Center for the Computational Design of Functional Layered Materials (CCDM) [DE-SC0012575]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The commercialization of electrochemical energy conversion and storage devices relies largely upon the development of highly active catalysts based on abundant and inexpensive materials. Despite recent achievements in this respect, further progress is hindered by the poor understanding of the nature of active sites and reaction mechanisms. Herein, by characterizing representative iron-based catalysts under reactive conditions, we identify three Fe-N-4-like catalytic centers with distinctly different Fe-N switching behaviors (Fe moving toward or away from the N-4-plane) during the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR), and show that their ORR activities are essentially governed by the dynamic structure associated with the Fe2+/3+ redox transition, rather than the static structure of the bare sites. Our findings reveal the structural origin of the enhanced catalytic activity of pyrolyzed Fe-based catalysts compared to nonpyrolyzed Fe-macrocycle compounds. More generally, the fundamental insights into the dynamic nature of transition-metal compounds during electron-transfer reactions will potentially guide rational design of these materials for broad applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据