4.1 Article

Solubilities, Fugacities and All That in Solution Chemistry

期刊

JOURNAL OF SOLUTION CHEMISTRY
卷 44, 期 5, 页码 1004-1061

出版社

SPRINGER/PLENUM PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1007/s10953-014-0279-8

关键词

Chemical thermodynamics; Solubility; Fugacity; Henry fugacity; Fugacity coefficients; Activity coefficients; Partial molar enthalpy change on solution; Partial molar heat capacity change on solution; Partial molar volume at infinite dilution

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Solution chemistry is at the heart of many research areas in the pure and applied sciences. In fact, for more than a century, experimental as well as theoretical work on solution properties and phase equilibria involving liquid/fluid solutions in general, and aqueous liquid/fluid solutions in particular, have held prominent positions in (bio-)physical chemistry. The scientific insights gained thereby are invaluable and have not only contributed decisively to the creation of the formal structure of chemical thermodynamics but have also paved the way for the development of practically useful molecular-based models describing real solution behavior. In the first part of this review, I shall present a concise overview of the thermodynamic formalism relevant in solubility studies on liquid/fluid nonelectrolyte systems. In the second part, selected aspects of solubility data reduction and data correlation will be touched upon, including a critical evaluation of some popular approximations and a survey of current estimation technique for indispensable auxiliary quantities, such as virial coefficients and partial molar volumes at infinite dilution. One of the goals will be to clarify issues frequently overlooked and to dispel misconceptions encountered in the literature. Pride of place will be given to the Henry fugacity (also known as Henry's law constant), which is one of the most misunderstood thermodynamic quantities, and to various caloric quantities derived via van't Hoff analysis of high-precision solubility data.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据