4.3 Article

Effects of duty cycle on the preparation and property of PbO2-CeO2 nanocomposite electrodes

期刊

JOURNAL OF SOLID STATE ELECTROCHEMISTRY
卷 20, 期 3, 页码 725-731

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10008-015-3099-x

关键词

PbO2-CeO2 nanocomposite electrodes; Pulse electrodeposition; Duty cycle; Electrocatalytic property; Stability

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21576065]
  2. Training Program of Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars of Hebei Province of China [B2015202289]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

PbO2-CeO2 nanocomposite electrodes were prepared by pulse electrodeposition in the lead nitrate solution containing CeO2 nanoparticles with different duty cycles. The effects of duty cycle on the morphology and phase structure were investigated by scanning electronic microscopy (SEM) and X-ray diffraction (XRD), respectively. The SEM and XRD results show that the decrease of duty cycle can reduce the grain size of PbO2-CeO2 nanocomposite electrodes and make the electrodes more compact. The CeO2 content in composite electrodes increases with the decrease of duty cycle. The steady-state polarization curves and accelerated life tests demonstrate that the oxygen evolution overpotential and service life of PbO2-CeO2 nanocomposite electrodes increase with the decrease of duty cycle. The service life of PbO2-CeO2 nanocomposite electrodes prepared with 25 % duty cycle reaches 218 h which is 1.8 times longer than that of PbO2-CeO2 nanocomposite electrodes prepared by direct electrodeposition. The bulk electrolysis shows that the degradation of malachite green (MG) on the PbO2-CeO2 nanocomposite electrodes is the pseudo-firstorder reaction and the MG and chemical oxygen demand (COD) removal efficiency on PbO2-CeO2 nanocomposite electrodes increases with the decrease of duty cycle, which can be attributed to the higher oxygen evolution overpotentials, electrochemical active surface area, and CeO2 content in the composite electrodes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据