4.5 Article

Identification of quantitative trait loci for resistance to bending-type lodging in rice (Oryza sativa L.)

期刊

EUPHYTICA
卷 198, 期 3, 页码 353-367

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10681-014-1111-7

关键词

Lodging resistance; Breaking strength; QTL; CSSL; Rice

资金

  1. [23780014]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [23780014] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bending-type lodging is one of the most important factors affecting the yield and grain quality of rice. This study identified quantitative trait loci (QTLs) for physical strength of the upper culms, and evaluated QTL effects on lodging resistance. In 2010 and 2011, QTLs for breaking strength, length, and diameter of the top three internodes were identified by analyzing chromosomal segment substitution lines (CSSLs) developed from 'Koshihikari' and 'Kasalath'. The QTL analysis indicated that 'Kasalath' had two types of QTLs: one to strengthen specific internodes and one to simultaneously improve the physical strengths of plural internodes or the top three internodes. A QTL for breaking strengths of the top three internodes (bsuc11) was detected on chromosome 11 in both years. This QTL did not overlap with that for internode length. To evaluate the effects of bsuc11 on lodging resistance, this study selected three CSSLs with bsuc11 and analyzed the breaking strengths of the top three internodes after heading and the pushing resistance of the lower part. Internodes of 'Koshihikari' showed decreased breaking strengths after grain filling, while those of CSSLs with bsuc11 did not show this decrease in breaking strength. The pushing resistance of the lower part at the fully ripe stage was the same in 'Koshihikari' and CSSLs with bsuc11. These results suggested that bsuc11 could be a target to improve the physical strength of the upper culms to resist bending-type lodging, and that the physical strengths of upper and lower parts are controlled by different genetic factors in rice.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据