4.5 Article

Molecular tagging and marker-assisted selection of fiber quality traits using chromosome segment introgression lines (CSILs) in cotton

期刊

EUPHYTICA
卷 200, 期 2, 页码 239-250

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10681-014-1150-0

关键词

Cotton; Chromosome segment substitution lines; QTL mapping; Fiber quality

资金

  1. System of Modern Agriculture Industrial Technology [SDAIT-07-011-02]
  2. Science and Technology Development Project [2012GGB01026]
  3. Natural Science foundation [ZR2013CM005]
  4. Agricultural Seed Project of Shandong Province

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Gossypium barbadense L is an important genetic resource to improve fiber quality of Gossypium hirsutum L., but breeders have generally encountered difficulties in introgression following whole genome crosses primarily due to genomic incompatibility, complex genetic basis and low efficiency of phenotypic evaluation and selection on fiber quality. Chromosome segment substitution lines (CSILs) are a powerful tool to dissect and introgress alien alleles while minimizing negative effects from alleles on other chromosome segments of the donor parent. In the present study, using a CSIL+F-2 mapping strategy, three QTLs each for fiber length (FL), fiber strength (FS) and micronaire value (MIC) were identified on chromosome 11 and 1, explaining 6.23-10.73 % of the phenotypic variation in the F-2:3 population. In addition, through marker-assisted backcrossing, the G. barbadense alleles of these QTLs were incorporated into two elite commerical Upland cotton cultivars, Lumianyan28 (L28) and Shannongmian6 (SNM6). Field evaluation indicated that 80 % of the BC2F3 lines containing the qFL-c11-1 and qFS-c11-1 from Hai7124 had significantly higher FL and FS, while only 14.5 % BC2F3 lines containing the qMIC-c1-1 in SNM6 genetic background showed significant decrease in MIC. Some BC2F3 lines with improved target fiber quality traits and without remarkable deviations in non-target lint yield components were obtained.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据