4.5 Article

Genetics and mapping of quantitative traits for nodule number, weight, and size in soybean (Glycine max L.[Merr.])

期刊

EUPHYTICA
卷 195, 期 3, 页码 419-434

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10681-013-1005-0

关键词

Nitrogen fixation; Nodule; QTL; Soybean; Symbiosis

资金

  1. United Soybean Board
  2. United States Department of Agriculture-Agriculture Research Service (USDA-ARS) [6402-21220-012-00D]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Soybean research has found that nodule traits, especially nodule biomass, are associated with N-2 fixation ability. Two genotypes, differing in nodule number per plant and individual nodule weight, KS4895 and Jackson, were mated to create 17 F-3- and 80 F-5-derived RILs. The population was mapped with 664 informative markers with an average distance of less than 20 cM between adjacent markers. Nodule traits were evaluated in 3-year field trials. Broad-sense heritability for nodule number (no. plant(-1)), individual nodule dry weight (mg nodule(-1)), individual nodule size (mm nodule(-1)), and total nodule dry weight (g plant(-1)) was 0.41, 0.42, 0.45, and 0.27, respectively. Nodule number was negatively correlated with individual nodule weight and size. Nodule number, individual nodule weight, and size are major components which likely contributed to increased total nodule weight per plant. Composite interval mapping (CIM) identified eight QTLs for nodule number with R-2 values ranging from 0.14 to 0.20. Multiple interval mapping (MIM) identified two QTLs for nodule number, one of which was located close to the QTL identified with CIM. Six QTLs for individual nodule weight were detected with CIM, and one QTL was identified with MIM. For nodule size, CIM identified seven QTLs with R-2 values ranging from 0.14 to 0.27. Five QTLs for total nodule weight were detected with CIM, one of which was located close to a QTL identified with MIM. These results document the first QTL information on nodule traits in soybean from field experiments utilizing a dense, complete linkage map.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据