4.2 Article

Effects of Age and Experience on Male Mate Choosiness

期刊

ETHOLOGY
卷 121, 期 4, 页码 353-363

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/eth.12344

关键词

male mate choice; sexual selection; courtship; fruit flies; Drosophila melanogaster; age; experience

资金

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  2. Canada Foundation for Innovation
  3. Ontario Innovation Trust

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mate choosiness by males has been documented in many taxa but we still do not know how it varies with age even though such variation can be important for our understanding of sexual selection on females. Theory provides conflicting predictions: young males, who are less attractive to females than older males, may be less choosy, or older males, who face fewer expected future mating opportunities, may be less choosy. In our experiments with fruit flies (Drosophila melanogaster), young (1-d-old) males spent relatively less time courting recently mated females than did mature (4-d-old) males. Overall, there was a gradual decline in male mate choosiness from age 1-7d. As male age was correlated with the duration of deprivation from females, we tested for the effect of deprivation and found that same-age males previously exposed to females were choosier than female-deprived males. We also assessed key male parameters that could affect choosiness and found that, compared to mature males, young males were less attractive to females, less competitive in intramale interactions and less fertile. Although the lesser attractiveness and competitiveness should select for lesser mate choosiness in young males, their limited fertility and more expected future mating opportunities seem to override the other factors and lead to high mate choosiness in young males. Overall, our data indicate that young males just after reaching sexual maturity are choosy and that subsequent exposure to females can maintain high levels of male mate choosiness with age. Hence, males can contribute much more to sexual selection than previously appreciated.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据