4.6 Article

Resin pellets from beaches of the Portuguese coast and adsorbed persistent organic pollutants

期刊

ESTUARINE COASTAL AND SHELF SCIENCE
卷 130, 期 -, 页码 62-69

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecss.2013.06.016

关键词

plastic debris; marine pollution; organic pollutants; Portugal

资金

  1. Fundacao para a Ciencia e Tecnologia [PTDC/MAR/102677/2008]
  2. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [PTDC/MAR/102677/2008] Funding Source: FCT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The occurrence of stranded plastic marine debris along the Portuguese coastline was investigated. Number of items m(-2) and size range of resin pellets were recorded, corresponding to 53% of total marine debris collected items. In addition, concentrations of adsorbed persistent bioaccumulative and toxic chemicals (PBTC) were determined, PAH - polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons; PCB - polychlorinated biphenyls and DDT - dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane. Matosinhos (Mt) and Vieira de Leiria (VL) presented the highest number of items m(-2) (362 and 332, respectively). Resin pellets with 4 mm diameter were the most abundant (50%). Contaminants concentration was variable. PAH concentrations recorded values between 53 and 44800 ng g(-1), PCB ranged from 2 to 223 ng g(-1) and DDT between 0.42 and 41 ng g(-1). In general, aged and black pellets recorded higher concentrations for all contaminants. Matosinhos (Mt), Vieira de Leiria (VL) and Sines (Si), near industrial areas and port facilities, were the most contaminated beaches. Research efforts are needed to assess the points of entry of industrial plastic pellets in order to take action and minimize impacts on the ecosystems, in particular, points of transfer during transportation from plastic manufacturers to plastic converters should be identified and controlled so that virgin pellets are contained and will not enter rivers and be carried to the oceans where they can remain for a long time and travel great distances. (c) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据