4.6 Article

Myrionecta rubra (Mesodinium rubrum) bloom initiation in the Columbia River estuary

期刊

ESTUARINE COASTAL AND SHELF SCIENCE
卷 95, 期 4, 页码 440-446

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecss.2011.10.015

关键词

Myrionecta rubra; red water; bloom development; Columbia River estuary

资金

  1. Science and Technology Center for Coastal Margin Observation & Prediction (CMOP)
  2. National Science Foundation [OCE-0424602]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To better understand the development of the annually recurring late summer red water blooms of the phototrophic ciliate Myrionecta rubra in the Columbia River estuary we examined its standing stocks and measured its growth rates both in the estuary main channels and in Baker Bay, a peripheral embayment situated near the river mouth. Data collected during two summers show a biphasic development of M. rubra blooms, with an initial phase when the protist was only detected in Baker Bay, followed by an established phase when red waters were observed throughout the lower estuary. Ilwaco harbor (Baker Bay's seaward-end) is at least one of the locations where the bloom starts since M. rubra was detected there at concentrations >100s cell L(-1) before Chinook harbor (Baker Bay's upriver-end) or the estuary main channels. In 2010, this initial phase lasted about 1.5 months, spanning the neap tide of early July to the beginning of the neap tide of mid-August. While high growth rates were measured in Ilwaco harbor during the initial phase (1.2-3.1 d(-1)) and in the estuary main channels in both surface red (0.7 d(-1)) and adjacent non-red (1.1 d(-1)) waters during the established period, growth of the ciliate was not detected in Ilwaco harbor during this second phase. Growth rate data obtained during the established bloom phase also suggest that M. rubra cells in the estuary mostly divide during the daytime and that red water patches might experience self-shading. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据