4.6 Article

Low-temperature combustion synthesis of cobalt magnesium ferrite magnetic nanoparticles: effects of fuel-to-oxidizer ratio and sintering temperature

期刊

JOURNAL OF SOL-GEL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
卷 76, 期 2, 页码 298-308

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10971-015-3777-2

关键词

Solution combustion synthesis; Glycine-to-nitrate ratio; Sintering temperature; Adiabatic flame temperature; Magnetism

资金

  1. International Centre for Materials Science, Jawaharlal Nehru Centre for Advanced Scientific Research, Bangalore, India

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The effects of glycine-to-nitrate molar ratio (G/N) and sintering temperature of 600 A degrees C on the solution combustion synthesis of nanocrystalline Co0.8Mg0.2Fe2O4 (CMFO) are reported. The structural, morphological and magnetic properties of CMFO could be controlled by using different combinations of glycine fuel and metal nitrates and also sintering temperature. Thermodynamic considerations of the combustion processes show that the exothermicity, adiabatic flame temperature and the amount of gases released increase with increase in G/N. The auto-combusted and sintered powders obtained were characterized by X-ray diffraction, Raman spectroscopy, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), thermo-gravimetric analysis-differential scanning calorimetry and vibrating scanning magnetometer measurements. SEM images of CMFO showed that the G/N ratio and sintering temperature had pronounced effect on the microstructure regarding density and porosity. The magnetization, crystallite sizes and crystallinity of the CMFO spinel phase increased with increase in G/N ratio and sintering temperature. Raman spectroscopic analysis showed that only the fuel-rich sample gave the five Raman active modes characteristic of a spinel structure. The obtained results were also discussed in comparison with ferrite system formed by different synthesis processes. XRD of CMFO auto-combustion powders prepared with different G/N ratios: (a) G/N = 2.22, (b) G/N = 1.48 and (c) G/N = 0.74. [GRAPHICS] .

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据