4.5 Article

Differences in the Feeding Ecology of Two Seagrass-Associated Snails

期刊

ESTUARIES AND COASTS
卷 34, 期 6, 页码 1140-1149

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12237-011-9406-6

关键词

Gastropods; Herbivory; Thalassia; Seagrass; Epiphytes; Bermuda

资金

  1. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
  2. Marine Environmental Program Lab
  3. Bermuda Institute of Ocean Sciences (BIOS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Grazing by small epifauna on live seagrass leaves was formerly viewed as unimportant in controlling plant biomass and growth, instead researchers focused on the indirect benefits of small invertebrates that crop algal competitors. Recent evidence shows that the emerald nerite Smaragdia viridis preferentially ingests seagrass leaf tissue. In contrast, the button snail Modulus modulus feeds on epiphytes and periphyton coating the leaves. We conducted laboratory microcosm and field experiments to investigate how the different feeding preferences of these seagrass-associated snails affect turtlegrass Thalassia testudinum primary production. Data revealed that after 24 h S. viridis reduced foliar biomass (25%) and chlorophyll (30%) and injured the equivalent of 50% of daily seagrass growth per shoot. Conversely, M. modulus did not affect these variables. Our results emphasize that in subtropical seagrass communities not all small epifauna browse off leaf surfaces and some can have important direct negative impacts on their seagrass host.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据