4.5 Article

Trajectories and stability of self-reported short sleep duration from adolescence to adulthood

期刊

JOURNAL OF SLEEP RESEARCH
卷 24, 期 6, 页码 621-628

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/jsr.12316

关键词

adolescent; adult; epidemiological; longitudinal; sleep period

资金

  1. Norwegian Research Council
  2. National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) [APP1065576]
  3. NHMRC Career Development Fellowship [1064272]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The trajectories and stability of self-reported sleep duration recorded at ages 13, 15, and 23years on reported sleep duration at age 30years among 1105 students (55% male) who participated in the Norwegian Longitudinal Health and Behaviour Study were examined. Questionnaire data were used to obtain demographic and sleep variables. Dichotomised short sleep duration was based on normative values and set as 8.5h (age 13years), 8h (age 15years) and 7h (ages 23 and 30years). Results indicated a significant overall reduction in total sleep duration (h per night) across age groups. Sleep duration (continuous) at age 15 and 23years (whole group) was moderately but positively correlated with sleep duration at age 30years (P<0.01). When split by sex, at age 15years, this association was present among females only (P<0.01); however, at age 23years, this association was present in both male and females (both P<0.001). Categorical short sleep at age 23years (whole group) was associated with short sleep at age 30years (unadjusted odds ratio=3.67, 95% confidence interval 2.36-5.69). Following sex stratification, this effect was significant for both males (unadjusted odds ratio=3.77, 95% confidence interval: 2.22-6.42) and females (unadjusted odds ratio=2.71, 95% confidence interval: 1.46-5.04). No associations were noted for categorical short sleep at ages 13 or 15years, and subsequent short sleep at 30years. Habitual short sleep duration during middle adulthood is not sustained from the time of early adolescence. Rather, these trends appear to be formed during early adulthood.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据