4.2 Review

Surgical outcomes in lesional and non-lesional epilepsy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

期刊

EPILEPSY RESEARCH
卷 89, 期 2-3, 页码 310-318

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2010.02.007

关键词

Epilepsy surgery; Non-lesional epilepsy; MRI; Histopathology; Surgical outcomes

资金

  1. University of Saskatchewan
  2. Royal University Hospital Foundation, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan.

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purposes: To provide evidence-based quantitative summary estimates of seizure outcomes in patients with non-lesional and lesional epilepsy treated with surgery, and to assess the consistency of results among published studies. Methods: An exhaustive literature search identified articles published since 1995, describing outcomes according to lesional status in patients of any age who underwent resective epilepsy surgery. Two reviewers independently assessed study eligibility and extracted the data. Disagreements were resolved through discussion. Random effects meta-analyses were used after assessing the dataset for heterogeneity. Results: Forty articles fulfilled eligibility criteria and described outcomes in 697 patients with non-lesional epilepsy and 2860 patients with lesional epilepsy. Overall, the odds of being seizure-free after surgery were 2.5 times higher in patients with lesions on MRI or histopathology (OR 2.5, 95%CI 2.1, 3.0, p < 0.001). In patients with temporal lobe epilepsy surgery the odds were 2.7 times higher in those with lesions (OR 2.7, 95%CI 2.1, 3.5, p< 0.001). In patients with extratemporal epilepsy surgery the odds were 2.9 higher in those with lesions (OR 2.9, 95%CI 1.6, 5.1, p< 0.001). Outcomes were similar in children, adults, and studies that used MRI or histopathology to identify lesions. Discussion: Overall, the odds of seizure freedom after surgery are two to three times higher in the presence of a lesion on histopathology or MRI. The results are clinically and statistically significant, consistent across various subgroups, and quite homogeneous across studies. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据