4.2 Article

Cyclooxygenase-2/PGE2 pathway facilitates pentylenetetrazol-induced seizures

期刊

EPILEPSY RESEARCH
卷 79, 期 1, 页码 14-21

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2007.12.008

关键词

COX-2; celecoxib; epilepsy; PGE(2); EEG; PTZ

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cyclooxygenases (CCXs) are rate-limiting enzymes in the metabolic pathways in which arachidonic acid is converted to prostaglandins. COX-2 is the isoform induced at injury/inflammation sites and expressed constitutively in a few tissues, such as the central nervous system, and plays a rote in neurodegenerative diseases associated with increased excitatory activity. However, the role of COX-2 and its main product, prostaglandin E-2 (PGE(2)), in the convulsive states is not fully established. In this study we showed that the selective COX-2 inhibitor, celecoxib (at the dose of 2mg/kg, but not at the doses of 0.2 or 20mg/kg, p.o.), protects against the seizures induced by pentylenetetrazol (PTZ, 60 mg/kg, i.p.). The role of PGE2 in the convulsions induced by PTZ was further investigated by administering anti-PGE(2) antibodies (4 mu g/2 mu l, i.c.v.), and assessing electroencephatographic changes induced by PTZ (PTZ, 60 mg/kg, i.p.). Anti-PGE(2) antibodies attenuated PTZ-induced seizures in rats. In addition, combining PGE(2) (100 ng/2 mu l, i.c.v.) with a subconvulsant dose of PTZ (20 mg/kg, i.p.) caused seizures, further supporting a role for this prostaglandin in the convulsions induced by PTZ. Finally, we showed that the anticonvulsant action of celecoxib (2 mg/kg, p.o.) was reversed by the intracerebroventricular administration of PGE(2) (10 ng/2 mu l, i.c.v.). These data constitute strong converging pharmacological evidence supporting a facilitatory role for the COX-2/PGE2 pathway in the seizures induced by PTZ. However, whether selective COX-2 inhibitors are safer anti-inflammatory drugs for epileptic patients than nonspecific inhibitors remains to be determined. (c) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据