4.2 Article

Reduction of secondarily generalized tonic-clonic (SGTC) seizures with pregabalin

期刊

EPILEPSY RESEARCH
卷 82, 期 1, 页码 86-92

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2008.07.004

关键词

Pregabalin; Secondarily generalized tonic-clonic; Seizure reduction; Placebo-controlled study; Refractory partial epilepsy

资金

  1. Pfizer Inc

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: To determine whether pregabalin reduces SGTC seizures in clinically refractory epilepsy. Methods: Design: Post hoc analysis performed on pooled data from three double-blind, placebo-controlled trials of similar design. Participants: Patients with partial seizures who failed >= 2 antiepileptic drugs at maximally tolerated doses. This analysis excluded those who did not have an SGTC seizure during baseline or treatment periods. Outcome measure: Absolute and conditional reduction analyses examined change from baseline in SGTC seizure rates. The absolute reduction analysis used response ratio (RRatio) to compare reduction in seizure-frequency from baseline (8) during a 12-week treatment (T) period [RRatio = ((T-B)I(T+B)) x 100]. The conditional analysis examined proportional risk of having SGTC seizure if a partial seizure had occurred. Results: Of 1052 intent-to-treat patients, 409 were included. Sixteen were seizure-free during treatment and not included in the conditional analysis. A significant reduction in absolute SGTC seizures from baseline was observed in patients receiving pregabalin 600 mg/day (treatment RRatio, -33 versus placebo, -3.7; P = 0.0005). A lower dose of pregabalin (300 mg/day), administered in one study, demonstrated a trend (nonsignificant) toward reduced SGTC seizures (treatment, -24.7 versus placebo, -10.0; P = 0.2493). Conclusion: As adjunctive therapy, pregabalin 600 mg/day is effective in reducing the absolute frequency of SGTC seizures in patients with refractory partial epilepsy, but not secondary generalization. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据