4.5 Article

Combination of ultracentrifugation and solid-phase extraction with subsequent chromatographic analysis of α-tocopherol in erythrocyte membranes

期刊

JOURNAL OF SEPARATION SCIENCE
卷 38, 期 4, 页码 634-640

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/jssc.201401036

关键词

Alpha-tocopherol; Erythrocyte membranes; Red blood cells; Solid-phase extraction; Ultracentrifugation

资金

  1. European Social Fund
  2. state budget of the Czech Republic [CZ.1.07/2.3.00/30.0061]
  3. Project MH CZ-DRO (UHHK) [00179906]
  4. IGA MH CZ [NT14265-3/2013]
  5. [SVV 267 002]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A novel and rapid sample pretreatment technique based on a combination of ultracentrifugation and solid-phase extraction for the determination of alpha-tocopherol in human erythrocyte membranes by high-performance liquid chromatography with ultraviolet detection is presented in this work. Red blood cell samples were ultracentrifuged (288 000 x g, 3 min, 4 degrees C) in the presence of D-mannitol, 4-(2-hydroxyethyl)-1-piperazineethanesulfonic acid and calcium chloride. The alpha-tocopherol was then extracted from the erythrocyte membranes by solid-phase extraction with n-hexane in the presence of ascorbic acid. Tocopherol acetate was used as the internal standard. The extract was dissolved in methanol and separated on the monolithic column Chromolith Performance RP-18e (100 x 4.6 mm) using 100% methanol as the mobile phase. The absorbance of alpha-tocopherol was measured at a wavelength of 295 nm. The method was validated and showed sufficient accuracy and precision, ranging from 96.4 to 100.8% and from 4.5 to 6.3%, respectively. Moreover, the developed method was applied to the determination of erythrocyte alpha-tocopherol in real samples from patients. The combined ultracentrifugation and solid-phase extraction technique substantially decreased the time for the sample pretreatment step compared to liquid-liquid extraction and could be applicable for the quantitation of other analytes in erythrocyte membranes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据