4.5 Article

Blood-brain barrier dysfunction can contribute to pharmacoresistance of seizures

期刊

EPILEPSIA
卷 55, 期 8, 页码 1255-1263

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/epi.12713

关键词

Pharmacoresistance; BBB disruption; Albumin; 4-Aminopyridine; Entorhinal Cortex; Rats

资金

  1. DFG through the Excellence Cluster NeuroCure

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: We tested the hypothesis that interstitial albumin can contribute to pharmacoresistance, which is common among patients with focal epilepsies. These patients often present with an open blood-brain barrier (BBB), resulting in diffusion of drug-binding albumin into the brain interstitial space. Methods: Seizure-like events (SLEs) induced by 100 mu M 4-aminopyridine (4-AP) were monitored using extracellular field potential recordings from acute rat entorhinal cortex-hippocampus slices. Effects of standard antiepileptic drugs (phenytoin, valproic acid, carbamazepine, and phenobarbital) were studied in the presence of albumin applied acutely or by intraventricular injection. Unbound antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) were detected by ultrafiltration and high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Results: Contrary to the absence of albumin, conventional AEDs failed to suppress SLEs in the rat entorhinal cortex in the presence of albumin. This effect was partially caused by buffering of phenytoin and carbamazepine (CBZ) by albumin. Increasing CBZ concentration from 50 mu M to 100 mu M resulted in block of SLEs. In slices obtained from animals that were pretreated with intraventricular albumin application 24 h prior to experiment, CBZ suppressed SLEs similar to control slices. We also found that application of serum-like electrolytes transformed SLEs into late recurrent discharges (LRDs), which were no longer responding to CBZ. Significance: A dysfunctional BBB with acute extravasation of serum albumin into the brain's interstitial space could contribute to pharmacoresistance. In such instances, choice of an AED with low albumin binding affinity may help in seizure control.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据