4.5 Article

Simultaneous BOLD fMRI and local field potential measurements during kainic acid-induced seizures

期刊

EPILEPSIA
卷 53, 期 7, 页码 1245-1253

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2012.03539.x

关键词

Animal model; Electrophysiology; Epilepsy; Functional imaging

资金

  1. Saastamoinen Foundation
  2. Academy of Finland [123579]
  3. Academy of Finland (AKA) [123579, 123579] Funding Source: Academy of Finland (AKA)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: To investigate how kainic acidinduced epileptiform activity is related to hemodynamic changes probed by blood oxygenation leveldependent functional magnetic resonance imaging (BOLD fMRI). Methods: Epileptiform activity was induced with kainic acid (KA) (10 mg/kg, i.p.), and simultaneous fMRI at 7 Tesla, and deep electrode local field potential (LFP) recordings were performed from the right hippocampus in awake and medetomidine-sedated adult Wistar rats. Key Findings: Recurrent seizure activity induced by KA was detected in LFP both in medetomidine-sedated and awake rats, even though medetomidine sedation reduced the mean duration of individual seizures as compared to awake rats (33 +/- 24 and 46 +/- 34 s, respectively, mean +/- SD p < 0.01). KA administration also triggered robust positive BOLD responses bilaterally in the hippocampus both in awake and medetomidine-sedated rats; however, in both animal groups some of the seizures detected in LFP recording did not cause detectable BOLD signal change. Significance: Our data suggest that medetomidine sedation can be used for simultaneous fMRI and electrophysiologic studies of normal and epileptic brain function, even though seizure duration after medetomidine administration was shorter than that in awake animals. The results also indicate that neuronal activity and BOLD response can become decoupled during recurrent kainic acidinduced seizures, which may have implications to interpretation of fMRI data obtained during prolonged epileptiform activity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据