4.5 Article

Altered white matter integrity in temporal lobe epilepsy: Association with cognitive and clinical profiles

期刊

EPILEPSIA
卷 51, 期 4, 页码 536-545

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2009.02508.x

关键词

Temporal lobe epilepsy; Diffusion tensor imaging; Cognition; Age of seizure onset

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health (NIH) [T32 NS45540, K23 NS060993]
  2. Epilepsy Foundation Target Initiative for Mood Disorders
  3. Institute for Clinical and Translational Science, School of Medicine, University of California, Irvine
  4. National Center for Research Resources [5M01RR00827-29]
  5. U.S. Public Health Service

向作者/读者索取更多资源

P>Purpose: Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) studies have reported substantial white matter abnormalities in patients with temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE). However, limited data exist regarding the extent of white matter tract abnormalities, cognitive effects of these abnormalities, and relationship to clinical factors. The current study examined these issues in subjects with chronic TLE. Methods: DTI data were obtained in 12 TLE subjects and 10 age-matched healthy controls. Voxel-wise statistical analysis of fractional anisotropy (FA) was carried out using tract-based spatial statistics (TBSS). White matter integrity was correlated with cognitive performance and epilepsy-related clinical parameters. Results: Subjects with TLE, as compared to healthy controls, demonstrated four clusters of reduced FA, in anterior temporal lobe, mesial temporal lobe, and cerebellum ipsilateral, as well as frontoparietal lobe contralateral to the side of seizure onset. Mean FA was positively correlated with delayed memory, in anterior temporal lobe; and immediate memory, in mesial temporal lobe. Lower FA values in the posterior region of corpus callosum were related to earlier age of seizure onset. Conclusion: TLE is associated with widespread disturbances in white matter tracts and these changes have important cognitive and clinical consequences.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据