4.5 Review

Nonconvulsive status epilepticus and coma

期刊

EPILEPSIA
卷 51, 期 2, 页码 177-190

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2009.02297.x

关键词

Coma; Nonconvulsive status epilepticus; Encephalopathies; EEG; Prognosis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nonconvulsive status epilepticus (NCSE) in a comatose patient cannot be diagnosed without electroencephalography (EEG). In many advanced coma stages, the EEG exhibits continuous or periodic EEG abnormalities, but their causal role in coma remains unclear in many cases. To date there is no consensus on whether to treat NCSE in a comatose patient in order to improve the outcome or to retract from treatment, as these EEG patterns might reflect the end stages of a dying brain. On the basis of EEG, NCSE in comatose patients may be classified as generalized or lateralized. This review aims to summarize the ongoing debate of NCSE and coma and to critically reassess the available literature on coma with epileptiform EEG pattern and its prognostic and therapeutic implications. The authors suggest distinguishing NCSE proper and comatose NCSE, which includes coma with continuous lateralized discharges or generalized epileptiform discharges (coma-LED, coma-GED). Although NCSE proper is accompanied by clinical symptoms suggestive of status epilepticus and mild impairment of consciousness, such as in absence status or complex focal status epilepticus, coma-LED and coma-GED represent deep coma of various etiology without any clinical motor signs of status epilepticus but with characteristic epileptiform EEG pattern. Hence coma-LED and coma-GED can be diagnosed with EEG only. Subtle or stuporous status epilepticus and epilepsia partialis continua-like symptoms in severe acute central nervous system (CNS) disorders represent the borderland in this biologic continuum between NCSE proper and comatose NCSE (coma-LED/GED). This pragmatic differentiation could act as a starting point to solve terminologic and factual confusion.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据