4.5 Article

Whole-genome bisulfite DNA sequencing of a DNMT3B mutant patient

期刊

EPIGENETICS
卷 7, 期 6, 页码 542-550

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.4161/epi.20523

关键词

DNA methylation; DNA methyltransferase; DNMT3B; whole genome bisulfite sequencing; immunodeficiency; CpG island; X chromosome; histone; transposon

资金

  1. European Research Council (ERC) [268626]
  2. MICINN [SAF2011-22803]
  3. Cellex Foundation
  4. European Community
  5. Health and Science Departments of the Generalitat de Catalunya
  6. [PITN-GA-2009-238242-DisChrom]
  7. [HEALTH-F5-2011-282510-BLUEPRINT]
  8. ICREA Funding Source: Custom

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The immunodeficiency, centromere instability and facial anomalies (ICF) syndrome is associated to mutations of the DNA methyl-transferase DNMT3B, resulting in a reduction of enzyme activity. Aberrant expression of immune system genes and hypomethylation of pericentromeric regions accompanied by chromosomal instability were determined as alterations driving the disease phenotype. However, so far only technologies capable to analyze single loci were applied to determine epigenetic alterations in ICF patients. In the current study, we performed whole-genome bisulphite sequencing to assess alteration in DNA methylation at base pair resolution. Genome-wide we detected a decrease of methylation level of 42%, with the most profound changes occurring in inactive heterochromatic regions, satellite repeats and transposons. Interestingly, transcriptional active loci and rRNA repeats escaped global hypomethylation. Despite a genome-wide loss of DNA methylation the epigenetic landscape and crucial regulatory structures were conserved. Remarkably, we revealed a mislocated activity of mutant DNMT3B to H3K4me1 loci resulting in hypermethylation of active promoters. Functionally, we could associate alterations in promoter methylation with the ICF syndrome immunodeficient phenotype by detecting changes in genes related to the B-cell receptor mediated maturation pathway.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据