4.5 Article

TCF21 and PCDH17 methylation An innovative panel of biomarkers for a simultaneous detection of urological cancers

期刊

EPIGENETICS
卷 6, 期 9, 页码 1120-1130

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.4161/epi.6.9.16376

关键词

urological cancer; detection; DNA methylation; urine test

资金

  1. Liga Portuguesa Contra o Cancro-Nucleo Regional do Norte
  2. Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation [96474]
  3. Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia [SFRH/BD/23374/2005]
  4. Norwegian Cancer Society [RAL: PK01.2007.0386]
  5. [Plurianual SAU-Norte-776]
  6. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [SFRH/BD/23374/2005] Funding Source: FCT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The three main types of urological cancers are mostly curable by surgical resection, if early detected. We aimed to identify novel DNA methylation biomarkers common to these three urological cancers, potentially suitable for non-invasive testing. From a candidate list of markers created after gene expression assessment of pharmacologically treated cell lines and tissue samples, two genes were selected for further validation. Methylation levels of these genes were quantified in a total of 12 cancer cell lines and 318 clinical samples. PCDH17 and TCF21 methylation levels provided a sensitivity rate of 92% for bladder cancer, 67% for renal cell tumors and 96% for prostate cancer. Methylation levels were significantly different from those of cancer free individuals (N = 37) for all tumor types (p < 0.001), providing 83% sensitivity and 100% specificity for cancer detection. Although in urine samples the sensitivity was 60%, 32% and 26% for bladder, renal, and prostate tumors, respectively (39% overall), absolute specificity was retained. We identified novel and highly specific methylation markers common to the three main urological cancers. However, additional efforts are required to increase the assay's sensitivity, enabling the simultaneous non-invasive screening of urological tumors in a single voided urine analysis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据