4.5 Article

A DNA methylation microarray-based study identifies ERG as a gene commonly methylated in prostate cancer

期刊

EPIGENETICS
卷 6, 期 10, 页码 1248-1256

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.4161/epi.6.10.17727

关键词

DNA methylation; prostate cancer; ERG; biomarker; polycomb

资金

  1. Oregon Clinical and Translational Research Institute (OCTRI)
  2. National Center for Research Resources (NCRR), National Institutes of Health (NIH) [5 KL2 RR024141-04]
  3. NIH Roadmap for Medical Research [NIH RR024141]
  4. Flight Attendant Medical Research Institute (FAMRI)
  5. OHSU Knight Cancer Institute
  6. Pacific Northwest Prostate Cancer SPORE [NIHP50-CA97186]
  7. NIH, Cancer Center [P30-CA015704]
  8. NIH [5UL1RR024140]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

DNA methylation of promoter regions is a common event in prostate cancer, one of the most common cancers in men worldwide. Because prior reports demonstrating that DNA methylation is important in prostate cancer studied a limited number of genes, we systematically quantified the DNA methylation status of 1,505 CpG dinucleotides for 807 genes in 78 paraffin-embedded prostate cancer samples and three normal prostate samples. The ERG gene, commonly repressed in prostate cells in the absence of an oncogenic fusion to the TMPRSS2 gene, was one of the most commonly methylated genes, occurring in 74% of prostate cancer specimens. In an independent group of patient samples, we confirmed that ERG DNA methylation was common, occurring in 57% of specimens, and cancer-specific. The ERG promoter is marked by repressive chromatin marks mediated by polycomb proteins in both normal prostate cells and prostate cancer cells, which may explain ERG's predisposition to DNA methylation and the fact that tumors with ERG DNA methylation were more methylated, in general. These results demonstrate that bead arrays offer a high-throughput method to discover novel genes with promoter DNA methylation such as ERG, whose measurement may improve our ability to more accurately detect prostate cancer.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据