4.6 Article

Smoking and Risk of Multiple Sclerosis Evidence of Modification by NAT1 Variants

期刊

EPIDEMIOLOGY
卷 25, 期 4, 页码 605-614

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000089

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke [R01 NS049510, R01 NS0495103]
  2. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases [R01 AI076544]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Tobacco smoke is an established risk factor for multiple sclerosis (MS). We hypothesized that variation in genes involved in metabolism of tobacco smoke constituents may modify MS risk in smokers. Methods: A three-stage gene-environment investigation was conducted for NAT1, NAT2, and GSTP1 variants. The discovery analysis was conducted among 1588 white MS cases and controls from the Kaiser Permanente Northern California Region HealthPlan (Kaiser). The replication analysis was carried out in 988 white MS cases and controls from Sweden. Results: Tobacco smoke exposure at the age of 20 years was associated with greater MS risk in both data sets (in Kaiser, odds ratio [OR] - 1.51 [95% confidence interval (CI) - 1.17-1.93]; in Sweden, OR = 1.35 [1.04-1.74]). A total of 42 NAT1 variants showed evidence for interaction with tobacco smoke exposure (P-corrected < 0.05). Genotypes for 41 NAT1 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were studied in the replication data set. A variant (rs7388368C>A) within a dense transcription factor-binding region showed evidence for interaction (Kaiser, OR for interaction = 1.75 [95% CI = 1.19-2.56]; Sweden, OR = 1.62 [1.05-2.49]). Tobacco smoke exposure was associated with MS risk among rs7388368A carriers only; homozygote individuals had the highest risk (A/A, OR = 5.17 [95% CI = 2.17-12.33]). Conclusions: We conducted a three-stage analysis using two population-based case-control datasets that consisted of a discovery population, a replication population, and a pooled analysis. NAT1 emerged as a genetic effect modifier of tobacco smoke exposure in MS susceptibility.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据